Ira Kasdan is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, a national law firm, where he brings more than 40 years of litigation experience to complex federal matters. He has served as lead counsel in several significant class actions against the Social Security Administration, including Greenberg v. Colvin in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which set the precedent for the award of Section 406(b) attorney fees in class actions and Steigerwald v. Berryhill, litigated in the Northern District of Ohio and the Sixth Circuit.
Damon Suden is a partner in the New York office of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP. An accomplished litigator and trial attorney with more than 20 years of practice in federal and state courts across the country, Mr. Suden has significant class action experience and currently serves as co-lead counsel in a certified class action against the Social Security Administration in the Eastern District of Virginia.
Holding SSA Accountable Through Class Actions
This program examines how attorneys can pursue class actions against the Social Security Administration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23. Using recent precedent and a pending certified class action in the Eastern District of Virginia, the session explores the procedural and substantive hurdles unique to suing a federal agency. Particular focus is given to whether SSA benefit notices sufficiently trigger exhaustion requirements under the Social Security Act. Attorneys will gain insight into how notice, waiver, and exhaustion doctrines influence litigation strategy. The program also discusses broader implications for beneficiaries challenging underpaid benefits.
Eligible for up to 1 CLE Credit Hour.
This session was originally submitted for CLE as a live, in-person presentation and a live webcast for the 2026 Spring National Conference and may be eligible for self-study credit. Each state handles self-study credit differently; for questions, please consult your State Bar Association.
Recorded Friday, April 24, 2026
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: April 24, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Ira Kasdan, Esq., Partner | Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Ira Kasdan is a partner in the Washington, D.C. office of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP, a national law firm, where he brings more than 40 years of litigation experience to complex federal matters. He has served as lead counsel in several significant class actions against the Social Security Administration, including Greenberg v. Colvin in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, which set the precedent for the award of Section 406(b) attorney fees in class actions and Steigerwald v. Berryhill, litigated in the Northern District of Ohio and the Sixth Circuit. He is currently co-lead counsel in a third certified class action pending against the SSA in the Eastern District of Virginia. Mr. Kasdan is admitted to practice in the District of Columbia and Maryland bars, various federal circuit courts, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
Education & Credentials
Recognition & Leadership
Professional Involvement
Experience
Damon Suden, Esq., Partner | Kelley Drye & Warren LLP
Damon Suden is a partner in the New York office of Kelley Drye & Warren LLP. An accomplished litigator and trial attorney with more than 20 years of practice in federal and state courts across the country, Mr. Suden has significant class action experience and currently serves as co-lead counsel in a certified class action against the Social Security Administration in the Eastern District of Virginia. He holds a Bachelor of Science in Mathematics and Political Science from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1999) and a Juris Doctor from Fordham University School of Law (2002).
Education & Credentials
Recognition & Leadership
Professional Involvement
Experience
I. Class Actions Against the SSA: A Refresher and Update | 11:00am – 12:00pm
The session will review the requirements of FRCP 23 to bring and certify a class action with particular focus on issues pertinent to such cases against the SSA, as demonstrated by precedent. Particular attention would be given to a pending class action in the E.D.Va. in which a class already has been certified. One of the significant issues in the currently-pending class action in the E.D.Va. concerned whether the type and quality of notice that SSA provides beneficiaries in award letters or otherwise is sufficient to trigger the requirement under the Social Security Act that they begin to exhaust their remedies or waive their right to sue. The session will explore this issue in some depth as it is relevant not only in the context of class actions but more generally for awardees in pursuing their rights when they believe that their benefits have been underpaid.