Francesca Giannoni-Crystal practice bridges Civil Law and Common Law systems, with over two decades of experience advising multinational corporations, law firms, and financial institutions. She focuses on cross-border ethics, international professional responsibility, and multijurisdictional practice issues, often serving as a “lawyer for lawyers” on complex matters involving conflicts of interest, privilege, and professional-conduct compliance.
What Will You Learn
Attorneys will learn to identify competing choice-of-law approaches governing attorney–client privilege in cross-border disputes, including lex fori, Restatement § 139, and the "touch base" test.
What Will You Gain
Attorneys will gain practical strategies for structuring international communications, managing cross-border teams, and minimizing waiver and disclosure risks in international disputes and investigations.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: April 16, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Francesca Giannoni-Crystal | Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC
Francesca Giannoni-Crystal is a dually qualified U.S. and Italian attorney whose practice bridges Civil Law and Common Law systems, with over two decades of experience advising multinational corporations, law firms, and financial institutions. She focuses on cross-border ethics, international professional responsibility, and multijurisdictional practice issues, often serving as a “lawyer for lawyers” on complex matters involving conflicts of interest, privilege, and professional-conduct compliance. As co-founder of Crystal & Giannoni-Crystal, LLC, she provides guidance on navigating overlapping legal regimes, particularly in international transactions and cross-border representation. She also contributes to advancing education in this field through her work with Technethics, an initiative dedicated to ethics, technology, and global legal compliance.
Education & Credentials
Recognition & Leadership
Professional Involvement
Experience
SESSION 1 – Attorney–Client Privilege vs. Confidentiality and Work Product | 1:00pm – 1:10pm
This section provides a guide of attorney–client privilege, distinguishing it from ethical confidentiality duties and work product protection, while explaining its evidentiary nature under federal law, including Rule 501 and applicable state privilege rules in diversity jurisdiction cases.
SESSION 2 – Cross-Border Attorney–Client Privilege Issues | 1:10pm – 1:20pm
This section examines attorney–client privilege challenges in cross-border and international contexts, focusing on conflicts arising from differing legal standards, inconsistent protections, and the complexities created by communications spanning multiple jurisdictions with divergent privilege doctrines.
SESSION 3 – The Proliferation of Choice-Of-Law Approaches in U.S. Courts | 1:20pm – 1:30pm
This section reviews the proliferation of choice-of-law approaches used by U.S. courts, including lex fori, Restatement Section 139, most significant relationship tests, touch base analysis, law of the decision, and comity-based frameworks applied in privilege determinations.
SESSION 4 – Common Cross-Border Fact Patterns Raising Privilege Uncertainty | 1:30pm – 1:40pm
This section analyzes common cross-border scenarios creating privilege uncertainty, including communications with foreign in-house counsel, multinational transactions, involvement of foreign lawyers or consultants, and parallel proceedings involving cross-border discovery under 28 U.S.C. Section 1782.
SESSION 5 – Practical Guidance for Lawyers | 1:40pm – 1:50pm
This section provides practical guidance for attorneys, including strategies for structuring international communications, managing cross-border legal teams, maintaining documentation, and proactively addressing privilege risks, discovery disputes, and forum selection considerations in complex international matters.
SESSION 6 – Application of Occam’s Razor to Privilege Choice-Of-Law | 1:50pm – 2:00pm
This section explores applying Occam’s Razor to privilege choice-of-law analysis, proposing a modified lex fori approach to simplify competing doctrines, enhance predictability, and support more efficient and fair outcomes in cross-border privilege disputes.